Staying When Leaving Would Be Understandable
Orpah did nothing wrong, and that is exactly why Ruth's choice teaches us so much.
Ruth 1:14NIV
The book of Ruth does not criticise Orpah. She wept, she kissed her mother-in-law, and she went back to her mother's house, which is what Naomi told her to do. It was reasonable. She had a future in Moab and none in Bethlehem. If you had been her friend you would have advised the same.
That is what makes Ruth's decision so striking. She stayed when leaving would have been completely understandable. Nobody would have called her disloyal for going home. She chose a costlier faithfulness than anyone required of her.
Ordinary weeks are full of Orpah moments. A commitment you could quietly drop. A friend whose troubles have gone on longer than you expected. A church that has become inconvenient. A spouse in a season that gives back very little. In each case there is a reasonable exit, and taking it would not make you a bad person.
Christian faithfulness often lives in exactly that space, doing the thing that is more than fair. Ruth did not cling because she had to. She clung because she had decided whose people were now her people. Decide that once, clearly, and many later decisions become simpler. You will still feel the pull of the road back to Moab. You will just already know which way you are walking.
More in Living
The front door and the grumble
Peter's instruction about hospitality is short, and the qualifier is the hard part.
Read the whole letter in one sitting
This week's tip is simple and rarely done: hear 1 Peter the way its first readers did.
Spend like a foreigner
Peter calls Christians strangers in the world, and that identity reaches all the way into the wallet.